Discussion

Let us know what you think about any topic related to the Sierra Nevada Adaptive Management Project in the forums below. The Principal Investigators on the UC Science Team cannot answer every post, but they will read all comments in their areas, and respond to comments as a group at each quarterly meeting. We greatly value your input!

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:06 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Success: understanding steps of overall work plan, and how they link together and to FS Work Plan; this is successful public participation

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:06 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Success measured by activities and not Powerpoint presentations: where meeting with people, how are you talking to them; show how input is utilized, be honest about how input is used or not used, and reasons why

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:05 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Success=do you walk your talk, i.e., everything that’s being presented

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:03 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Success linked to spatial scale of research; may need different measures for success

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:03 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Reduction of appeals is a good measure

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:03 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

How well are you satisfying concerns of people: giving answers, resolving, not just addressing

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:01 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

There are RCNDs already in existence, utilize these

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:01 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Need monitoring plan for capacity to achieve what is wanted: infrastructure, social capacity

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:01 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Why no socio-economic module? Needs to be comprehensive work plan

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:00 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Why is public brought in so late? 10 months into the process

Legend Show