Discussion

Let us know what you think about any topic related to the Sierra Nevada Adaptive Management Project in the forums below. The Principal Investigators on the UC Science Team cannot answer every post, but they will read all comments in their areas, and respond to comments as a group at each quarterly meeting. We greatly value your input!

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:11 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Moving target: climate change modeling suggests difficulty of prediction

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:10 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Primary value of forest is watershed and needs to be part of definition; what’s the target or vision?

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:10 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Recognize disease and insects are part of a healthy forest, include in definition

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:10 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Include humans who live in Sierras in definition of a healthy ecosystem; include all people who depend on Sierra Nevada system (broader); blend needs of people with needs of system

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:09 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Watershed modeling applicability to fireshed? Is this appropriate? Definitions are critical here.

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:09 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Need to know where we’re headed

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:09 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Need to integrate ecosystem and forest health; clarify differences

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:08 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Heterogeneity of landscape will affect definition

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:07 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Lack of scientifically defensible definition of what we want forests to look like

Dec. 9th Meeting Participant said at 8:07 p.m. on 6 January 2006 ,

Should consider QLG approaches

Legend Show